PaylaÅŸ
Because it is not a documentary... So you cannot debate the details of story; it is Can's interpretation.
It is for this reason that the question:Â
-Why is "Mustafa" causing so much discussion, while many such films about this subject exist?
It is because this representation is different... It is being perceived as if the country’s "national historical society" was involved in the making of the movie.
It was presented as a "state conception"...
For example, the premiere...
The film was premiered at
The
From its first day, "Mustafa" premiered with the image of a connection to "parliament and state".
Local television channels reported:
"
Here this is the difference in the presentation of this gala event.
I spoke to Parliamant Speaker Koksal Toptan.
Toptan is a democratic and well-intentioned individual, but as far as I could understand from our conversation, he was a little regretful.
I asked:
-When you gave permission for the gala event at
-No... But then I said that Dolmabahce is a special place for this movie... It relates to Ataturk. Can Dundar has a good reputation...
-"Well, if it was asked to you now, would you open the palace again… What would you say?
-I would not...
-Why?
-You hear the debates. And there are certain scenes; in particular, excessive alcohol and too many cigarettes.
-You watched the movie in
-No, actually it burned our fingers. It will not be allowed to happen again...
As I said, it seems more meaningful to discuss why this film has been so widely debated rather than its contents.
PaylaÅŸ