De Gaulle’s political legacy fading in France
Güncelleme Tarihi:
Reuters
Oluşturulma Tarihi: Mart 19, 2009 00:00
PARIS - After casting a long shadow for almost 40 years, former French President Gen. Charles de Gaulle’s shadow recedes in France with Paris’ decision to return to the heart of NATO and to improve ties with Washington. But recent moves spark fierce debate, as politicians across the spectrum accuse Nicolas Sarkozy of selling out French interests.
Almost 40 years after his death, Gen. Charles de Gaulle still makes his presence felt in France, with the main Paris airport, countless avenues and even the nation's biggest aircraft carrier all named after him. But in the political arena, his influence is fading fast. Since taking office in 2007, President Nicolas Sarkozy has unexpectedly diluted his legacy and there are no heavyweight "Gaullist" politicians left to defend the faith.
A parliamentary vote of confidence on Tuesday to approve a French return to NATO's military command marked perhaps the most symbolic break with de Gaulle's inheritance, bringing France firmly back to the Atlanticist fold after 43 years of self-imposed isolation.
Sarkozy, who has pronounced pro-American views, has concluded that France's interests are no longer best served by continuing a half-hearted relationship with Washington. "De Gaulle no longer carries much clout in French politics. His time is finally past," said Paul Godt, a professor of politics at the American University in Paris.
De Gaulle was the towering figure of 20th century French history, leading the resistance to Nazi occupation during World War IIand putting an end to its bloody war in Algeria. He founded Fifth Republic, giving the president's office huge powers, and crafted a distinctive foreign policy that rejected the concept of U.S. and Soviet world domination, giving the French an independent voice on the world stage. His decision to quit NATO's inner circle, taken in the midst of the Cold War, was the culmination of years of Franco-American rivalry.
Controversial move
With the tensions of the 1960s now largely superseded, Sarkozy's decision to return to the heart of NATO may seem an obvious step to outsiders, especially given that France is heavily involved in most of the alliance's military missions. But in a sign that de Gaulle still casts a long shadow across the domestic landscape, the move has elicited fierce debate at home, with politicians across the spectrum accusing Sarkozy of selling out French interests.
"They are throwing our heritage into the stinging nettles," said Francois Bayrou, head of the centrist Modem party who came third in the 2007 presidential election. The woman who came second, Socialist politician Segolene Royal, was equally critical. "Gen. de Gaulle saw the significance of serving as a bridge between the East and the West ... Times have changed but this role is as relevant as ever," she wrote in a blog. While Gaullist-inspired skepticism over ties with Washington is deeply entrenched in the political elite, the French people appear more open minded and two recent opinion polls have showed a clear majority back Sarkozy's NATO move.
The arrival of a hugely popular new U.S. president, Barack Obama, has helped Sarkozy make the break from de Gaulle and place a once recalcitrant Paris firmly in the Washington camp.
"Sarkozy has an historic opportunity here because he is doing this during the honeymoon period between Barack Obama and France," said Pascal Boniface, director of the Paris-based Institute of International and Strategic Relations.
Reworking Gaullism
The NATO move followed another splintering of de Gaulle's legacy when Sarkozy oversaw a recent reform of the Fifth Republic, strengthening parliament's powers and pegging back the president's ability to decide overseas military operations. Sarkozy's UMP party is the successor to the Gaullist RPR party and his supporters insist that far from riding roughshod over the memory of the revered general, he is actually following in his footsteps and continuing his tradition of innovation.
"Some people say I am betraying General de Gaulle," Sarkozy said last week when he announced the French return to NATO. "Who can say what Gen. de Gaulle would do today? Do you think he would have based his decisions of 1966 on the policies of 1923?" he added. There is at least one area where no one could accuse Sarkozy of tossing out the Gaullist textbook - economic dirigisme. De Gaulle promoted the combination of capitalism and a state-guided economy, never frightened to unleash gov’t intervention if he thought it would help local industries.
In this vein, Sarkozy has leapt on the crisis to reassert the state's role in economic management, be it by setting up funds to support strategic concerns or by enticing French car companies to bring their production back home. "Well, I say that the lessons of Gaullism are more relevant than ever," he added, perhaps hoping to convince nostalgic political allies that whatever he might be doing on the foreign stage, he remains a good old-fashioned Gaullist at heart.
A parliamentary vote of confidence on Tuesday to approve a French return to NATO's military command marked perhaps the most symbolic break with de Gaulle's inheritance, bringing France firmly back to the Atlanticist fold after 43 years of self-imposed isolation.
Sarkozy, who has pronounced pro-American views, has concluded that France's interests are no longer best served by continuing a half-hearted relationship with Washington. "De Gaulle no longer carries much clout in French politics. His time is finally past," said Paul Godt, a professor of politics at the American University in Paris.
De Gaulle was the towering figure of 20th century French history, leading the resistance to Nazi occupation during World War IIand putting an end to its bloody war in Algeria. He founded Fifth Republic, giving the president's office huge powers, and crafted a distinctive foreign policy that rejected the concept of U.S. and Soviet world domination, giving the French an independent voice on the world stage. His decision to quit NATO's inner circle, taken in the midst of the Cold War, was the culmination of years of Franco-American rivalry.
Controversial move
With the tensions of the 1960s now largely superseded, Sarkozy's decision to return to the heart of NATO may seem an obvious step to outsiders, especially given that France is heavily involved in most of the alliance's military missions. But in a sign that de Gaulle still casts a long shadow across the domestic landscape, the move has elicited fierce debate at home, with politicians across the spectrum accusing Sarkozy of selling out French interests.
"They are throwing our heritage into the stinging nettles," said Francois Bayrou, head of the centrist Modem party who came third in the 2007 presidential election. The woman who came second, Socialist politician Segolene Royal, was equally critical. "Gen. de Gaulle saw the significance of serving as a bridge between the East and the West ... Times have changed but this role is as relevant as ever," she wrote in a blog. While Gaullist-inspired skepticism over ties with Washington is deeply entrenched in the political elite, the French people appear more open minded and two recent opinion polls have showed a clear majority back Sarkozy's NATO move.
The arrival of a hugely popular new U.S. president, Barack Obama, has helped Sarkozy make the break from de Gaulle and place a once recalcitrant Paris firmly in the Washington camp.
"Sarkozy has an historic opportunity here because he is doing this during the honeymoon period between Barack Obama and France," said Pascal Boniface, director of the Paris-based Institute of International and Strategic Relations.
Reworking Gaullism
The NATO move followed another splintering of de Gaulle's legacy when Sarkozy oversaw a recent reform of the Fifth Republic, strengthening parliament's powers and pegging back the president's ability to decide overseas military operations. Sarkozy's UMP party is the successor to the Gaullist RPR party and his supporters insist that far from riding roughshod over the memory of the revered general, he is actually following in his footsteps and continuing his tradition of innovation.
"Some people say I am betraying General de Gaulle," Sarkozy said last week when he announced the French return to NATO. "Who can say what Gen. de Gaulle would do today? Do you think he would have based his decisions of 1966 on the policies of 1923?" he added. There is at least one area where no one could accuse Sarkozy of tossing out the Gaullist textbook - economic dirigisme. De Gaulle promoted the combination of capitalism and a state-guided economy, never frightened to unleash gov’t intervention if he thought it would help local industries.
In this vein, Sarkozy has leapt on the crisis to reassert the state's role in economic management, be it by setting up funds to support strategic concerns or by enticing French car companies to bring their production back home. "Well, I say that the lessons of Gaullism are more relevant than ever," he added, perhaps hoping to convince nostalgic political allies that whatever he might be doing on the foreign stage, he remains a good old-fashioned Gaullist at heart.